{"id":5559,"date":"2022-06-28T19:33:00","date_gmt":"2022-06-28T19:33:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/?post_type=publications&p=5559"},"modified":"2025-11-24T17:25:41","modified_gmt":"2025-11-24T17:25:41","slug":"update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj","status":"publish","type":"publications","link":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/","title":{"rendered":"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

On June 27, 2022, the United States Supreme Court ruled that doctors who act in subjective good faith in prescribing controlled substances to their patients cannot be convicted under the Controlled Substance Act (\u201cCSA\u201d).  The Court\u2019s decision will have broad implications for physicians and patients alike.  Practitioners who sincerely and honestly believe \u2013 even if mistakenly \u2013 that their prescriptions are within the usual course of professional practice will be shielded from criminal liability. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ruling stemmed from the convictions of Dr. Xiulu Ruan and Dr. Shakeel Kahn for unlawfully prescribing opioid painkillers.  At their trials, the district courts rejected any consideration of good faith and instructed the members of the jury that the doctors could be convicted if they prescribed opioids outside the recognized standards of medical practice. The Tenth and Eleventh Circuits affirmed the instructions.  Drs. Ruan and Kahn were sentenced to 21 and 25 years in prison, respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Court vacated the decisions of the courts of appeals and sent the cases back for further review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The question before the court concerned the state of mind that the Government must prove to convict a doctor of violating the CSA.  Justice Breyer framed the issue: \u201cTo prove that a doctor\u2019s dispensation of drugs via prescription falls within the statute\u2019s prohibition and outside the authorization exception, is it sufficient for the Government to prove that a prescription was infact not authorized, or must the Government prove that the doctor knewor intended that the prescription was unauthorized?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The doctors urged the Court to adopt a subjective good-faith standard that would protect practitioners from criminal prosecution if they sincerely and honestly believed their prescriptions were within the usual course of professional practice.  The Government argued for an objective, good-faith standard based on the hypothetical \u201creasonable\u201d doctor.  The Court took it one step further.<\/ins><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court.  He said that for purposes of a criminal conviction under the CSA, \u201cthe Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly or intentionally acted in an unauthorized manner.\u201d  To hold otherwise \u201cwould turn a defendant\u2019s criminal liability on the mental state of a hypothetical \u2018reasonable\u2019 doctor\u201d and \u201creduce culpability on the all-important element of the crime to negligence,\u201d he explained.  The Court has \u201clong been reluctant to infer that a negligence standard was intended in criminal statutes,\u201d wrote Justice Breyer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Justice Samuel Alito wrote a concurring opinion, which Justice Clarence Thomas joined and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined in part.  Although Justice Alito would vacate the judgments below and remand for further proceedings, he would hold that the \u201cexcept as authorized\u201d clause of the CSA creates an affirmative defense that defendant doctors must prove by a preponderance of the evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Court\u2019s decision will protect patient access to prescriptions written in good faith.  However, for the government, the Court\u2019s decision means prosecutors face an uphill battle in charging, much less convicting, physicians under the CSA.  Indeed, the Court\u2019s decision may have a chilling effect on the recent surge in DOJ prosecutions of medical practitioners and pain clinics. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

As always, Dinsmore attorneys are following this development and remain available for counsel in matters pertaining to SCOTUS\u2019 decision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On June 27, 2022, the United States Supreme Court ruled that doctors who act in subjective good faith in prescribing controlled substances to their patients cannot be convicted under the Controlled Substance Act (\u201cCSA\u201d).  The Court\u2019s decision will have broad implications for physicians and patients alike.  Practitioners who sincerely and honestly believe \u2013 even if\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"tags":[],"publication-type":[8],"class_list":["post-5559","publications","type-publications","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","publication-type-articles"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nUpdate: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ - Dinsmore & Shohl<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Dinsmore & Shohl\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-24T17:25:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Opioid-Liability_Header-06.jpg?w=1024\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/\",\"name\":\"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ - Dinsmore & Shohl\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Opioid-Liability_Header-06.jpg?w=1024\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-28T19:33:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-24T17:25:41+00:00\",\"description\":\"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Opioid-Liability_Header-06.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Opioid-Liability_Header-06.jpg\",\"width\":2084,\"height\":751},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/\",\"name\":\"Dinsmore & Shohl\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Dinsmore & Shohl\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Dinsmore-Final-Logo-Navy.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Dinsmore-Final-Logo-Navy.svg\",\"width\":413,\"height\":54,\"caption\":\"Dinsmore & Shohl\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ - Dinsmore & Shohl","description":"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ","og_description":"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/","og_site_name":"Dinsmore & Shohl","article_modified_time":"2025-11-24T17:25:41+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Opioid-Liability_Header-06.jpg?w=1024","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/","name":"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ - Dinsmore & Shohl","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Opioid-Liability_Header-06.jpg?w=1024","datePublished":"2022-06-28T19:33:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-24T17:25:41+00:00","description":"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Opioid-Liability_Header-06.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Opioid-Liability_Header-06.jpg","width":2084,"height":751},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/update-in-opioid-liability-ruling-for-doctors-scotus-deals-blow-to-doj\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Update: In Opioid Liability Ruling for Doctors, SCOTUS Deals Blow to DOJ"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/","name":"Dinsmore & Shohl","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#organization","name":"Dinsmore & Shohl","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Dinsmore-Final-Logo-Navy.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Dinsmore-Final-Logo-Navy.svg","width":413,"height":54,"caption":"Dinsmore & Shohl"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications\/5559","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publications"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications\/5559\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61952,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications\/5559\/revisions\/61952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5559"},{"taxonomy":"publication-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication-type?post=5559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}