{"id":35882,"date":"2021-04-23T21:23:00","date_gmt":"2021-04-23T21:23:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/?post_type=publications&p=35882"},"modified":"2025-11-21T18:28:43","modified_gmt":"2025-11-21T18:28:43","slug":"united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use","status":"publish","type":"publications","link":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/","title":{"rendered":"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

After spending over 10 years in court, the Google vs. Oracle copyright saga has finally come to an end. The U.S. Supreme Court, ruling 6-2 in Google\u2019s favor, found that when Google used pieces of Java software developed by Oracle to build the Android operating system, it was within the parameters of the fair use doctrine that permits the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances.[i]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2005, Google copied roughly 11,500 lines of software code from Java SE\u2014a software platform owned by Oracle\u2014to create the Android mobile operating system. While Oracle claimed Google stole and infringed upon key elements of its copyrighted material, Google argued it only used a small portion of the overall code and then transformed it into the Android platform, which constituted permissible transformative use. The two main issues in the case were: (1) whether the Java SE platform and related software code were copyrightable works, and, if so, (2) whether Google\u2019s copying of the code was permissible fair use, which would absolve Google of liability for infringement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fair use is when copyrighted material is transformed into a new piece of work, usually by adding new expression or meaning. When determining whether the use of copyrighted material is considered fair use, and therefore not copyright infringement, four factors are used: (1) the purpose and character of use, (2) the nature of the copyrighted work, (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.[ii]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The decision in favor of Google turned on the first and third factors. The Court found that the purpose of Google\u2019s use of the code was to create new products and \u201cexpand the use and usefulness of Android-based smartphones,\u201d [iii]<\/a> which is exactly the type of innovation that copyright law seeks to incentivize. Copyright is intended to encourage creativity and the creation of original pieces of work, and Google did just that: it created a new and original smart phone operating system. Turning to the third factor, in writing for the majority, Justice Stephen Breyer explained that while Google did copy 11,500 lines of Oracle\u2019s software code, it only amounted to 0.4 percent of the 2.86 million lines of code included in Java SE. The Court did not find this to be a substantial amount of use of Oracle\u2019s code. Moreover, Google limited its use of the code to only as much as it needed in order to create the Android operating system and developed the rest of the system without the code. If it had based the entire operating system on Oracle\u2019s code, the outcome may have been different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Google called the decision \u201ca big win for innovation, interoperability and computing,\u201d[iv]<\/a> but Oracle believes it will hinder smaller companies\u2019 ability to compete with tech giants such as Google, stating \u201c[t]hey stole Java and spent a decade litigating as only a monopolist can.\u201d[v]<\/a> It may be tempting to view the Court\u2019s ruling as a one-sided victory for software developers who want to use portions of proprietary software without a license, but it\u2019s important to note that this kind of litigation is highly fact-intensive and can take years and a lot of expense to achieve the result that Google did.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And while the battle may be over for Google and Oracle, the Court\u2019s decision not to address whether the software code was copyrightable opens the door for future disputes regarding to what extent software and computer programs can be copyrighted. The Court briefly mentioned that some works are closer to the \u201ccore\u201d of copyright than others, and that codes such as Java are further away from that core than other computer programs in general\u2014but it never gave a clear explanation for why this is the case.[vi]<\/a>Without clearer criteria for copyrightable software, the issue will likely continue to be determined on a case-by-case basis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

[i]<\/a> 17 U.S.C. \u00a7 107.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[ii]<\/a> Google LLC v. Oracle Am., Inc<\/em>., No. 18-956, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1864, at *27-28 (Apr. 5, 2021), citing 17 U.S.C. \u00a7 107.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[iii]<\/a> Id<\/em>. at *45.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[iv]<\/a> Kent Walker, Senior Vice President, Global Affairs, Google (@Kent_Walker), Twitter (Apr. 5, 2021, 11:10 AM), https:\/\/twitter.com\/Kent_Walker\/status\/1379089169302003716<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[v]<\/a> Press Release, Oracle, Oracle Statement Regarding Oracle v. Google. (Apr. 5, 2021), https:\/\/www.oracle.com\/news\/announcement\/oracle-statement-regarding-oracle-v-google-040521.html<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[vi]<\/a> Google, <\/em>2021 U.S. LEXIS 1864, at *43.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

After spending over 10 years in court, the Google vs. Oracle copyright saga has finally come to an end. The U.S. Supreme Court, ruling 6-2 in Google\u2019s favor, found that when Google used pieces of Java software developed by Oracle to build the Android operating system, it was within the parameters of the fair use\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"tags":[],"publication-type":[8],"class_list":["post-35882","publications","type-publications","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","publication-type-articles"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nUnited States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use - Dinsmore & Shohl<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Dinsmore & Shohl\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-21T18:28:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Google-vs-Oracle-Banner.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/\",\"name\":\"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use - Dinsmore & Shohl\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Google-vs-Oracle-Banner.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-23T21:23:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-21T18:28:43+00:00\",\"description\":\"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Google-vs-Oracle-Banner.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Google-vs-Oracle-Banner.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/\",\"name\":\"Dinsmore & Shohl\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Dinsmore & Shohl\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Dinsmore-Final-Logo-Navy.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Dinsmore-Final-Logo-Navy.svg\",\"width\":413,\"height\":54,\"caption\":\"Dinsmore & Shohl\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use - Dinsmore & Shohl","description":"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use","og_description":"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/","og_site_name":"Dinsmore & Shohl","article_modified_time":"2025-11-21T18:28:43+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Google-vs-Oracle-Banner.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/","name":"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use - Dinsmore & Shohl","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Google-vs-Oracle-Banner.jpg","datePublished":"2021-04-23T21:23:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-21T18:28:43+00:00","description":"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use Read insights and legal analysis from attorneys at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Google-vs-Oracle-Banner.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Google-vs-Oracle-Banner.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/publications\/united-states-supreme-court-finds-googles-use-of-oracles-software-was-fair-use\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"United States Supreme Court Finds Google\u2019s Use of Oracle\u2019s Software Was Fair Use"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/","name":"Dinsmore & Shohl","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#organization","name":"Dinsmore & Shohl","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Dinsmore-Final-Logo-Navy.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Dinsmore-Final-Logo-Navy.svg","width":413,"height":54,"caption":"Dinsmore & Shohl"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications\/35882","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publications"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications\/35882\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61374,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications\/35882\/revisions\/61374"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35882"},{"taxonomy":"publication-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dinsmore.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication-type?post=35882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}